Commentaires sur : Your opinion interests me!

Par : Herminia Chronister

Herminia Chronister — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:08:05 +0000

I am always looking online for posts that can help me. Thanks!

Par : Sachiko Debellis

Sachiko Debellis — Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:20:21 +0000

Hey there, most likely our own placing may well be incorrect topic although at any rate, Being previously looking close to yuor web blog but it looks cool. Its noticeable you’re sure a person’s topic so you search fervent to fix it. I am setting up a fresh new blog i i am scheming to make it all look fantastic, and still provide premium blog posts. Obtaining learned a good deal staying in the site together with When i look forward to more article content and you will be re-occurring subsequently. Thanks a lot.

Par : jeux import uk

jeux import uk — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:55:12 +0000

i think also that one of the event must be online. For the others, to my mind, there is no many differences

Par : SACrowe

SACrowe — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:35:12 +0000

One of the event types should be ‘online’ … for non-live events, such as virtual conferences, webinars, and the like. The location would be a URL.

Par : Stewart

Stewart — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:10:52 +0000

Hi Heirem,

Just to clarify, I am looking forward to using event types, just not the phase/participation options. As far as removing them, what I have done in the current version is to use CSS to hide the input fields that I don’t want to present to users (namely, event visibility and the create-post-for-event option). I had to tag some table rows in order to get the functionality I wanted:

(...and so on...)

And then in my theme’s CSS I added

.addEventForm tr.visibilityRow { display: none; }

I think this makes for a nice balance, allowing a lot of customization for those willing to edit the CSS but without cluttering the admin UI with options that few people are interested in.

Par : R Bland

R Bland — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:51:35 +0000

I am unable to ad event types…
Well at least ones that stay.

Par : Heirem

Heirem — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:50:35 +0000

Dear Stewart,
It is quite that. The types of events will normally not related to the categories of WP. The types of events in the screenshot are examples. The user can enter those he wants.

To go without types of events it is also to go without functions of filtration and research in the front-end. To make use easier there will always be the possibility of leaving “No event types” in creation. To add an option to allow or not the management of type would make me add another option and, believe me, there are already enough options like that!

Best Regards

Par : Heirem

Heirem — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:39:46 +0000

Hello Benjamin,
No there will always be a single article related to a single event. I do not see the others and what would be the mess in the loop!

Par : Stewart

Stewart — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:27:09 +0000

For my own purposes, I envision using event types that are distinct from the WP categories in use on the site.

Personally I don’t anticipate using either the phase or participation options, and I will probably try to remove them from the add/edit event form to keep it as simple as possible for the user.

Par : Blogs à l'école

Blogs à l'école — Thu, 28 May 2009 07:29:57 +0000

By the way,

Does that mean that we could add events to a regular wordpress with a lot of articles, and that everything won’t be mixed together in the loop ?

Benjamin